The work that people who dare to document do brings a pyscho-social element that is not often discussed or understood. Feelings such as anger, frustration, depression… all as a result of what someone has heard, seen and experienced while engaged in documenting.

"As we are responding to people who are suffering, we not may not be aware of it, but we are suffering as well."

Alice Nah, University of York

What are organizations and individuals doing to help address their own trauma? What are the practices, beliefs, and norms that have led to such a widespread crisis in the world of human rights documentation? Today on the podcast we hear from researchers and scholars in the field of psychology and human rights, Alice Nah and Adam Brown.

Also mentioned: Human Rights Resilience Project

avatar
Mark Fonseca Rendeiro
Producer & Host - Cartara
avatar
Vidushi Marda
Senior Program Officer - Article 19
avatar
Rory Byrne
Founder - Security First

The story used to be: the tech industry develops a monitoring tool, governments would be slow to understand and adopt them. Two decades later, that script has been flipped; governments are not only actively using new tools as part of their surveillance capacity, they are also involved in the proliferation of those tools, so that any government in the world can and eventually will have access to them. Moreover, the practices and purposes of monitoring citizens' use of technology have found their way into some very strange and disturbing aspects of our lives.

Vidushi Marda of Article 19 and Rory Byrne of Security First join us on the podcast today to discuss the growth of the surveillance state and the priorities of governments when it comes to tracking, monitoring, and suppressing those who document or report.

avatar
Mark Fonseca Rendeiro
Cartara
avatar
Harlo Holmes
Freedom of the Press Foundation
avatar
Mark _
Open Tech Strategies

In episode 1 of The Cartara Podcast we looked at what being open source means and why it is important for the development of tools for documentation and digital security.

Today we get a step closer to the reality on the ground, with individuals who have been through the process of the development of open source tools that become useful to a broader audience, as well as tools that eventually become abandoned for myriad reasons. How does this process unfold over time, and what could be done to keep open source tools supported in a world where users, funders, and developers seem to regularly move on to the next thing?

Our guests today talk about their experience and where they see the problems when it comes to tool development and funding, as well as possible solutions to reduce the risks that communities-under-threat around the world face as a result of projects that get left behind.

avatar
Mark Fonseca Rendeiro
Cartara
avatar
Marie Gutbub
Prototype Fund
avatar
Raphael Mimoun
Horizontal

In our everyday lives we trust the developers of applications to protect our sensitive data, usually without knowing how or why these tools work. When we consider the documentation process: communication, data management, media recording; experts will often talk about the importance that they be open source. But do we understand what makes tools open source and how that matters for different documentation projects? Today on the innaugeral episode of the podcast, we speak with Marie Gutbub and Raphael Mimoun regarding what role being open source plays for the users and developers of tools used in both specialized activities and everyday life.

crossmenu